Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person engaged in driving C global 900 village buses.

On June 21, 2013, the Defendant driven the above bus on June 15:38, 2013, and continued three-lanes in front of the starting point of a club, which is one of the 1-10 roads in Dobong-gu Seoul, Dobong-gu, Seoul, along with three-lanes toward the Nowon-gu, Seoul High School.

Since the location has a crosswalk where signal lights are installed on the front side, the driver engaged in driving service has a duty of care to check whether there is a person who gets on a road by reducing speed and by checking well the right and the right and the right of the road, and to drive safely according to the new subparagraph.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and neglected it and caused the right side of the bus to be close to the right side of the bus, and then the defendant gets a pedestrian crossing from the right side of the road to the left side in accordance with the pedestrian signal from the defendant's direction to the left side, and put it back to the right side side.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury, such as mination of the right frame open to the right by occupational negligence, which requires approximately 12 weeks of treatment to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E (electronic summary form);

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. In light of the relevant legal provisions on criminal facts, Article 3(1) and the proviso of Article 3(2)6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act, the reason for sentencing of the instant traffic accident, where the victim suffers a very serious injury due to the instant traffic accident, the Defendant’s negligence going against the signal, while the victim walking along the crosswalk is not grossly negligent, considering the fact that the victim, who has walking along the crosswalk according to the pedestrian signal,

However, considering the fact that the defendant reflects the crime in depth, the fact that the vehicle is being insured by the comprehensive motor vehicle insurance, etc., the age, driving career, and other circumstances.