The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (two million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination is a favorable sentencing condition for the Defendant, such as the fact that the Defendant recognized the instant crime, and the Defendant is the aged of 71 years old and appears to be a beneficiary of basic living benefits due to economic difficulties.

However, in full view of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant received the face of a victim aged 74 who is aged 74 and suffered injury; (b) the responsibility of the Defendant was not weak; (c) the Defendant was forced to agree with the victim or was unable to recover damage up to the trial; and (d) the Defendant had the record of having been sentenced to a suspended sentence due to the same crime in around 207; and (c) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, and circumstances after the crime, etc., which are the conditions for sentencing specified in the instant case, the lower court’s sentence is too unreasonable, and thus, the Defendant and his defense counsel’s allegation of unfair

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.