logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2017.04.13 2016고단4800
아동복지법위반(아동학대)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

The defendant is the father of the victim D (n, E), victim F (n, E) and victim G (n, H).

The defendant divorceds from I who was the mother of the victims in 2003, and later the mother of the victims became the victims, but since January 2014, the defendant became the victims.

1. On August 2014, the Defendant 18:00, on the ground that, at the residence of the Defendant (J apartment No. 909, 203) in Ansan-si, Ansan-si, the Defendant: (a) caused the victim F to have stolen another person’s money; and (b) caused the victim F to have his her son’s son’s son and son’s son’s son and son’s son’s her son

Expenses made it possible to do so by the victim Fbucks and pucks.

2. On November 23, 2014, the Defendant: (a) at the residence of the Defendant as described in paragraph (1) around 08:30 on November 23, 2014; and (b) on the victim D, whether the Defendant “I do not have a person of why he/she would have to do so due

“The victim of the defect caused the plastic television mar on the ground that the victim D sent a fake card to him/her, where the victim’s margum mar on the victim D’s left side mar, approximately seven times, and approximately five times in the victim D’s left side mar with his/her hand.

3. On February 2, 2015, around 23:00, the Defendant reported that the victims were playing a mobile phone game and reported that the victims were playing a mobile phone game, and that the victims continued to have approximately three times the head of the victim F was boomed and approximately two times the head of the victim D.

4. On Aug. 1, 2015, the Defendant sent time to the victim D and F ad hoc glass of f due to the Defendant’s residence described in paragraph (1) of this Article, on the ground that the victim D would not mislead the victim D to speak.

5. On July 21, 2016, the Defendant heard that the victim F and G have stolen the Defendant’s money at the Defendant’s residence at k802 Dong 1304, Sinstitu City around 20:00, and whether she misleads the victims about what he would be.

“The victims shall be asked to the extent that the victims were unable to respond properly.”

arrow