logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.01.08 2014고단3840
도로교통법위반(음주측정거부)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 11:10 on June 22, 2014, the Defendant was driving a motor vehicle from the vicinity of the public health clinic located in the Dong-dong, without obtaining a driver’s license in a section of about 500 meters from the road to the parking lot of the Yongsan-dong, Yongsan-dong.

2. On June 22, 2014, at around 11:10, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (refluence of the noise measurement) on the ground that the freight vehicles parked in order to transport the article while driving a vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle of the State, the Defendant

On June 22, 2014, at around 11:36, the Defendant, in addition to the witness’s statement that the Defendant was driving, the face of the Defendant is red, inaccurate, and does not walk properly, and there are reasonable grounds to recognize that the Defendant was driving under the influence of alcohol, such as the rain distance, etc., in addition to the witness’s statement that the Defendant was driving, the Defendant requested the above slope to comply with the drinking test by inserting the whole in a drinking measuring instrument into the drinking measuring instrument from the above slope, but did not comply with the alcohol test while smoking.

On June 22, 2014, at around 11:58 on June 22, 2014, the Defendant continued to go with the alcohol test from the above slope G during the period between approximately 20 minutes, but did not comply with the alcohol test by hand.

As a result, the Defendant did not comply with a police officer’s request for alcohol testing without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made by the police officer on I;

1. The circumstantial statement of an employee will be made;

arrow