1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation of this case is as follows: (a) the plaintiff's assertion of the second to 17 of the judgment of the court of first instance is dismissed as stated in the second to 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance; and (b) the fourth to 4 of the judgment is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding the following contents as stated in the third to 3 of the judgment of the court of first instance; and (c) thus, it is cited in accordance with

2. On the other hand, the Plaintiff believed that he will be subject to the Igbo, and the Plaintiff’s father died, and the Plaintiff was demanded to succeed to a traditional religious (confidential)’s private position with which he had been subject to the death, and refused this request, and the members of the said local council threatened the Plaintiff.

In the event that the plaintiff returned to his own country, it is likely to be detrimental to the reason that he refused to succeed to the status of the president.

In addition, it is more dangerous that Islamic armed forces return to their home country due to Bohovah, the Islamic armed forces.

Nevertheless, the Defendant’s disposition that did not recognize the Plaintiff as a refugee is unlawful.

3. The addition (D) of the Islamic armed entity, Boi, the Islamic armed entity, was in bad faith at present.

There is no assertion or proof that the Plaintiff’s return to ASEAN with particular attention would result in gambling, or that ASEAN’s authorities are not able to protect the Plaintiff.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.