Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 61,176,059 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from July 12, 2013 to June 3, 2015.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. 1) Gwangju Metropolitan City Construction Corporation on June 4, 2012 (hereinafter “instant Corporation”) shall be the Corporation in Gwangju Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter “instant Corporation”).
(2) The defendant awarded a contract to the defendant.
7. Of the above construction, steel framed subcontracted the steel framed to C, each of which subcontracted the reinforced concrete construction to the tin (main).
3) On July 6, 2012, C subcontracted the painting construction among the said steel framed construction to D (main owner). 4) On the part of the Defendant, C installed a pipe at the construction site of this case under the said subcontract with the Defendant. On September 2, 2012, the Plaintiff, as the representative of D (main owner), felled from three stories high, which is strong enough to vadi, while the Plaintiff moved to a pair line through the said non-line pipe, in order to promote the outside steel stairs in the construction site of this case, pursuant to the subcontract with the Defendant, around September 9:0, 2012.
(5) At the time of the instant accident, there was no safety net or screen screen installed at the site of the instant accident, and no sprink has been installed between the non-sprink pipes. 6) The Plaintiff sustained an injury, such as the regradation, etc. due to the instant accident.
[Reasons for Recognition] The facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, 6, and 7 are stated in the evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the result of the physical examination entrusted to the president of the original Hospital of Mine University, the purport of the entire pleadings
B. 1) The Plaintiff is liable to the Defendant as a building occupant under the main sentence of Article 758(1) of the Civil Act. As such, whether the Defendant is liable to the Defendant as a building occupant under the main sentence of Article 758(1) of the Civil Act shall be examined as to whether the Defendant is a person possessing the non-line pipe, which is the structure that caused the instant accident. The “building occupant” under Article 758(1) of the Civil Act refers to a person who has the authority and responsibility to repair and manage structures in order to prevent various accidents that may arise due to defects in the installation or preservation (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 200Da386, Apr. 21, 2000).