A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 5, 2017, the Defendant: (a) reported to the effect that he/she is "taxing articles and visitors satis; (b) on the front of the Han Bank, which is located in the Seodong-gu Daejeon, Daejeon; (c) and (d) received a request from police officers D and policemen belonging to the Daejeon Seo-gu, Daejeon, Daejeon, Police Station C, to present their personal information; (d) 4 times the back of the said D on drinking, 2 times the chest, and 2 times the left eye of the said E on the basis of his/her horses.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning 112 report processing.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes in which each police statement protocol against D and E is entered;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (a punishment imposed on a person who has committed a crime with heavier punishment than that of a crime)

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. In light of the reason reflectiveness of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act and the attitude of assault, it is clear that the public official has an intention to commit a crime and has no record of the same kind of crime.