Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. Intimidation Defendant: (a) sought the victim on the ground that the owner of the building who was the owner of the building that was the owner of the building that was on the first day of March 2016 and was newly built by Seongdong-gu Seoul, Seongdong-gu, to make a determination on the suitability of the installation of convenience facilities for the disabled at the 8th underground floor of the building located underground in Seongdong-gu, Seoul; and (b) did not from time bring damage to the money that was claimed in return for the said construction site; and (c) sought the victim’s identity as “Isson who will not complete the construction.” At night in the night-ro, I would like to go to E and die

The victim was threatened by showing the attitude of posing any harm to the body of the victim, such as the expression “defluence”.

2. Obstruction of business;

A. On March 29, 2016, the Defendant is not entitled to exercise the right of retention on the said new building at the Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D New Construction site, and even if the Defendant was instructed by the Defendant at the location of the first floor of the said new building, he may be held liable for civil criminal liability at the time of occupying the building without permission.

During the exercise of the right of retention, "F" posted a banner and obstructed the victim's new construction work by force.

B. On May 5, 2016, the Defendant, at the construction site of the above new building, did not have any authority to exercise the right of retention on the said new building at the site of the above new building, and in spite of the fact that the Defendant did not have the right to exercise the right of retention, he shall be punished for damage to property on the third floor rail of the said new

The representative among the exercise of the right of retention has interfered with the victim's new construction works by posting a banner "F" and by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The legal statement of the witness C;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of partially the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. On-site photographs of banners (the defendant did not have any threat to the victim, and posting each banner listed in Paragraph 2 of the criminal facts stated in the judgment did not have any intention to interfere with business.