A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. A special threat: (a) around 06:50 on January 29, 2020, the Defendant: (b) at the residence of a person related to de facto marriage in the building B, Gangnam-gu, Seoul; (c) on the ground that the victim was unable to suffer from the illness of the Defendant, the Defendant threatened the Defendant by taking a knife a knife (30 cm in total length, 18 cm in length on the day) that is a dangerous object that had been stuck inside the kitchen, which was a dangerous object in the inside of the kitchen, of which the Defendant was faced with the victim of the instant knife (21 cm in total, 9 cm in length). The Defendant threatened the victim by taking the knife the knife, and by taking the knife, with excessive knife that the victim was approaching the victim while approaching the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened the victim.

2. The Defendant damaged a special material by affixing a wall equivalent to KRW 5,00 in the market price of the victim D owned by the victim, which is a dangerous thing that was brought about by his hand continuously and at the same time and place as referred to in the above Paragraph 1, which is a dangerous thing that is not unfilled (21cm in total length, 9cm in length on the day).

3. Around 07:00 on January 29, 2020, the Defendant committed an assault against the police box belonging to the Embridge F, etc. of the Embox, who was dispatched to the site after receiving a report of 112 that “the male-docule under the influence of alcohol assaulted and threatened with knife” at the residence of the above D, and called “the snife would have been assigned to the name of the snife,” and used a blife f, etc. of the patroler to check the name tag, and used a blick F in order to check the name tag, and used the flife f, who was adjacent to the fl

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to F and D;

1. Written statements prepared in D;

1. 112 reported case handling table;

1. Photographs, such as damaged visibility and criminal tools, and photographs and on-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 284 and 283 of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of criminal facts;