logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2018.03.08 2017가단7400
임대차보증금
Text

1. At the same time, the Defendant received buildings listed in the separate sheet from the Plaintiff, and at the same time, KRW 70,000 from the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. 1) On July 13, 2017, the Plaintiff is a building indicated in the separate sheet owned by the Defendant (hereinafter “instant building”) between the Defendant and the Defendant, as indicated in the separate sheet owned by the Defendant.

(C) The Plaintiff’s lease agreement with respect to the lease deposit amounting to KRW 70 million and the term of lease from August 31, 2017 to August 30, 2019 (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”).

(2) On July 27, 2017, the Plaintiff paid the Defendant the lease deposit amount of KRW 70 million on or around July 27, 2017, and the Plaintiff was unable to move into the instant building because water leakage was generated on the inner floor of the said building, and the Defendant was a construction work to repair water leakage defects on or around August 3, 2017, and the Plaintiff moved into the building of this case on or around August 13, 2017.

3) However, even after the Plaintiff’s occupancy, leakage occurred not only in the inside bank of the instant building, but also in the small bank, and there was a defect due to deterioration in the heater installed in the toilet. 4) Accordingly, the Plaintiff requested the Defendant to repair the leakage of the instant building through a mobile phone text message, but the Defendant did not comply with the request, and around October 24, 2017, the Defendant did not have been able to live in the inner, small bank, and small bank due to the deterioration of the pipes, toilets, and toilets by November 3, 2017. As such, the Plaintiff urged the Defendant to repair the pipe and toilet dialter until November 3, 2017, and it stated that “The lease of this case is terminated as of November 4, 2017,” and the content of the above certification was presented to the Defendant.

arrow