logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.08.13 2018구단63634
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The background of the disposition and the political background of the Plaintiff’s nationality;

A. Circumstances 1) The plaintiff is the Republic of Camera (hereinafter referred to as "Kamera").

() On April 18, 2017, a foreigner of nationality entered the Republic of Korea as a short-term visit (C-3) sojourn status on a short-term basis, and applied for refugee status recognition to the Defendant on May 15, 2017. (2) On May 31, 2017, the Defendant rendered a decision not to grant refugee status on the ground that, with respect to the Plaintiff on May 31, 2017, the Defendant could not recognize “a well-founded fear that he would be subject to persecution” as a requirement for refugee under Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and

(3) On July 13, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on July 13, 2017, but the Minister of Justice dismissed the objection on August 21, 2018. (b) There is an implied conflict between the English-use area and the French-use area, and the English-use area is discriminated against and backward in comparison with the French-use area.

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The instant disposition that did not recognize the Plaintiff as a refugee is unlawful for the following reasons.

1 The plaintiff was residing in the English area in the Camera, "B".

The Kameri Government entered C University, one of the universities in the region B, in the English language, the Plaintiff, who uses French language, not in the English language, as stated in the preparatory document, as the Plaintiff was appointed on behalf of B. The university students frequently held anti-government demonstrations.

As such, D, a member of the National Assembly, who was in friendly with the Plaintiff, has ordered the Plaintiff to interfere with the anti-government demonstration by 250,000 universities and college students, and to conduct the activities to drive away the participants of the demonstration, but the Plaintiff will do so.

arrow