logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2020.02.19 2018고정484
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Victims B and C are members of the D Early Festivals Association, E and the Defendant are members of the F early stables Association, and victims G (the age of 49 years and remaining) are members of the D early stables Association.

On November 19, 2016, 14:30 on November 14:30, 2016, the victim B and C are at the early axis meeting (D) to which the victims belong and the members of the F early axiss Association belong, and the victim G of the same team who belongs to the same team is at the time fighting with E and solar problems, the counterpart team players.

On the ground that E is anti-end, the victim B and C suffered bodily injury, such as the victim Eul and the defendant jointly suffered bodily injury, such as the 14-day open upper part of the cage and the cage of the cage that require treatment for 14 days by cutting the lower part of E, and the defendant jointly assaulted the victim Eul and the defendant, and the defendant jointly assaulted the victim Eul and the defendant, such as the victim's face when drinking by drinking and cutting off the face of the defendant, and the cage of the cage and cage of the cage cage that require treatment for 14 days. On the contrary, the victim Eul and C jointly inflicted bodily injury on E and the defendant. In response, the victim Eul and the defendant were salvating the cage of the victim, and the defendant was salvating the victim's face by cutting off the cage.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statements made by witnesses G in the fourth trial records;

1. Partial statement of the witness J;

1. The first interrogation protocol of the police about B;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. The police statement of K;

1. The written statements of B and G (the defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant did not assault the victim B and the victim G in collaboration with E, but according to the above evidence, E and the defendant at the time of the instant case, while fighting with the victim's side and the victim's side, they are shaking the victim's face, and the defendant was found to have satisfing back the victim's face and satisfing back the side of the victim's face, and therefore, the above argument should not be accepted).

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and violence, etc. as to the choice of punishment;

arrow