logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.04.12 2018구단50560
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea on September 14, 2016 with the status of stay C-3 (short-term visit) of the Republic of Austria (Federia).

B. On September 20, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an application for recognition of refugee status with the Defendant, but on March 8, 2017, the Defendant rendered a disposition for recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on the ground that it is difficult to recognize “the well-founded fear that there is a risk of persecution” as stipulated in Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Convention”) and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Protocol”) and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Protocol”).

C. On April 11, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice against the instant disposition. However, the Minister of Justice dismissed the Plaintiff’s objection on the same ground on October 11, 2017.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 4, Eul evidence 1 to 3, and the purport of whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion was engaged in the clothing sales business in Austria, and around 2012, the Plaintiff’s store was destroyed by fire, and thus, it was impossible to pay the price for the goods to the business partner B.

After that, B began to threaten the plaintiff, and the plaintiff has moved to the damaged Modow.

B, however, around 2013, sought the Plaintiff’s attachment remaining in Ageia and threatened the Plaintiff with finding the Plaintiff, and around February 2016, B made a threat to the effect that B’s punishment is likely to die by finding the Plaintiff who was in Madyke as well as by taking out the Plaintiff’s liability for the purchase of goods.

In the event that the plaintiff returns to his own country, it is threatened by B with life or physical freedom.

arrow