1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On June 8, 2018, the Plaintiff was an employee for the daily work of the construction company B, who was employed for the construction of the company B, and was faced with an accident where approximately 2 meters from the slope of the construction site located in C at the time of March-si, 2018, the Plaintiff turned down under approximately 2 meters from the slope of the construction site, and the trees cut down to Furg (hereinafter “instant accident”).

B. After that, the Plaintiff received each diagnosis of “the external marropical marization of a signboard between the 4-5 trends, damage to the right-side scarfy, damage to the right-side scarfy, and the w lupfy,” and filed an application for medical care benefits therefor with the Defendant on June 19, 2018, alleging that each of the above diseases occurred due to the instant accident.

C. However, on June 28, 2018, the Defendant approved medical care on the part of the soldiers who applied for medical care benefits to the Plaintiff, based on the medical opinions of the Defendant’s counsel, “It is not possible to view it as satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise sate sate sate sate sate satise sate satise satise satise satise sate satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise sate sate sate sate sate sate sat sat sate sate sat sat

(D) A non-approval of the medical care or a decision that approved the medical care by changing the name of an injury or disease was made (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

The Plaintiff filed a petition for examination against the instant disposition, but the petition for examination on November 9, 2018 is filed.