1. All appeals by the plaintiffs and the defendant are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance as to this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the part to be changed or added as follows, and thus, it shall be quoted as it is by the main sentence of Article 420

The following contents should be added to the third-party 3, “the donation was completed on the ground of the donation contract.” Furthermore, the Plaintiffs asserted that the donation contract was nonexistent and that the remainder of the shares except the Defendant’s statutory inheritance was registered under a title trust. However, even though it is insufficient to recognize the above assertion solely on the basis of the statement in the evidence Nos. 2 and 10, there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Thus, the Plaintiffs’ assertion is without merit.

Article 8(1) of the Civil Code No. 8 of the 5th century provides that "no evidence exists, and even if there exists a lack of consent from the interpreter, there is no agreement on waiver of legal reserve before the commencement of inheritance (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 98Da9021, Jul. 24, 1998; 2010Da29409, Apr. 28, 201)." Article 17 of the 5th 17th 5th 17 statement "No evidence exists to prove that there was an agreement on calculation of contribution, or that there was a judgment by the family court on this," and the purport of the entire pleadings as a whole is examined in the evidence No. 9 of the 5th 17th 5th 5th 5th 5th 17th 5th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 5th 7th 7th 7th 1998.