logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2018.01.05 2017고단1787
업무방해등
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendants jointly committed the crime: (a) while drinking alcohol at the F cafeteria operated by the Victim E at the 18:40 on July 2, 2017, around 18:50 on July 2, 2017; (b) the victim’s main female employee was the 6th female employee and satis in food.

In light of the above, the Defendant 2 saw that the Defendant 1 was fluorily fluored with the Defendant’s 15 minutes of 15 minutes of 15 minutes of 15 minutes of 30 minutes of 30 minutes of 10 minutes of 10 minutes of 10 minutes of 10 minutes of 10 minutes of 203.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the victim's restaurant business by force.

2. On July 2, 2017, at around 19:25, Defendant A: (a) on the front of the F cafeteria as indicated in paragraph (1) around July 19:25; (b) on the front of the F cafeteria, the Defendant refused the request, even though he was arrested as a current offender of the crime of interference with duties by the police patrol officer assigned to the police patrol officer of the 112 reported and dispatched, and was compelled to board the patrol vehicle by force under the above circumstances; and (c) on the front of the patrol vehicle’s back glass of KRW 110,00,000.

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged the goods used by public offices.

3. On July 2, 2017, around 19:30 around July 19:1, 2017, the Defendant: (a) on the front side of the F cafeteria as described in paragraph (1); (b) on the top of the instant H’s left shoulder on which the Defendant was carrying the patrol vehicle, as described in paragraph (2) at one time.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of a flagrant offender by a police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Each police statement made to E, I, and H;

1. Statement of transactions;

1. Each photograph;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning CCTV images and field images;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and subparagraph A of the punishment: Articles 314(1), 30 (a), 141(1) (a) (a point of interfering with business affairs), and 141(2) (a) of the Criminal Act; Defendant B who selects a fine: Articles 314(1), 30 (a), and 136(1) of the Criminal Act; and Article 136 (1) (a) of the Criminal Act.

arrow