The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

A. The registered trademark of this case was not proved to have been properly used in the Republic of Korea within three years prior to the date of the request for revocation of the registered trademark of this case with respect to more than one of the products, and the registration of the designated goods of this case was revoked.

(1) Case Number Decision 2019Heo7603 203 2018 1656 locked, Maccocot, 2018 Maccot, Maccot, cpanty 2018 1658 Maccot, crode, lock-out locks, Kexz, Pexz, Duz, 2019 7634 2018 1660 2018 201618 20161 2018 20198 201626208 2018 1654 Maccot, 208 Maccot, Maccot 2018 Maccot, 1651 Maccot, 206 Maccot 2018 Maccot, 2018 Maccot 20165 Mabre 271818

2. The summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion falls under F and G, a non-exclusive licensee or exclusive licensee of the instant registered trademark, and the product photographs on the instant designated goods submitted by the Plaintiff include set numbers. According to the set number system, etc., it can be seen that the instant designated goods were produced and sold within three years prior to the date of the instant request for a trial.

Therefore, the Plaintiff properly used the instant registered trademark on the designated goods in Korea within three years from the date of request for trial by a non-exclusive licensee or exclusive licensee ( June 1, 2018).

Nevertheless, the decision of this case has to be revoked because it is judged differently.

3...