logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2020.05.07 2020누32908
자격정지처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following portions: (a) whether the grounds for disposition are recognized or not: (b) the part of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Attachment]

B. On December 22, 2018, the Plaintiff’s assertion as to whether the ground for disposition was recognized, the Plaintiff himself/herself acknowledged the fact that he/she stated “to get off or get off another vehicle” to the passengers who were in the vicinity of the building B at the crosswalk, and that he/she said “to get off or get off another vehicle.” However, the Plaintiff asserts that there exists a justifiable reason for refusing boarding as above, and asserts that there is a specific fact-finding as follows.

On December 22, 2018, the Plaintiff, who was under the influence of alcohol, was born a drunk passenger at the street in the Goyang-gu, Soyang-gu, Goyang-gu.

(C) Abrea passenger under the influence of alcohol was engaged in the taxi at a taxi set during operation.

The Plaintiff, after getting a drunk passenger to the destination, stopped for up to 2-3 minutes after moving to the destination, and stopped for up to 2-3 minutes, and opened a convenience store near C Station to clean up the set for cleaning water and the suspension, and then stopped for less than 1-minutes to a level of less than 2-3 minutes after moving to the destination.

Around 06:00, a passenger said that the passenger was a cab of the Plaintiff and the “scambling in the reverse cab,” while the Plaintiff was ventilating the vehicle as above.

However, in the state where the smelling of old soil has not yet been found, the passengers said to be “the use of other vehicles due to the situation”.

Accordingly, the passengers said that they would be known.

2) Inasmuch as e.g., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e.

The Plaintiff explained to the above passengers that the said passengers are "snicking snicking snicking," but responded to "snicking snicking, as soon as possible."

arrow