logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.11.09 2017고정684
청소년보호법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 200,000 won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who sells mixed sea and lubric oil with the trade name of (State)C.

1. On October 2016, the Defendant sold a male juvenile 1, the Red Sea 1 (10 intervention, 3,000 won) of the Special Corpon, a juvenile-related article harmful to juveniles, to a male juvenile 1, whose name was unknown, after reporting the Internet at the office of Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul (State) and the third floor (State) office, and whose name was unknown.

2. On November 2016, 2016, the Defendant sold to one male juvenile with whom the name of the Defendant was unknown at the same place as the above paragraph 1, a late mixed Sea 1 (10 intervention, 3,000 won), a juvenile-related article harmful to juveniles.

Summary of Evidence

1. Some statements made against the defendant during the police interrogation protocol;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to field photographs (five pages, thirty-one page of investigation records);

1. Article 58 Subparag. 3 and Article 28 Subparag. 1 of the former Juvenile Protection Act (Amended by Act No. 14446, Dec. 20, 2016; hereinafter “former Juvenile Protection Act”) and Articles 58 Subparag. 3 and 28 Subparag. 1 of the same Act, each of which is applicable to criminal facts and the choice of fines.

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court as to the Defendant’s assertion of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order, the termination of the Defendant’s provisional termination of the Defendant’s sexual origin during the sexual act is to strengthen the sexual stimulation, or to extend the period of sexual intercourse by having the male’s sexual origin during the sexual act stimulates sexual stimulation, and it is highly likely that the juveniles who are vulnerable to the stimulation and lack of self-control ability will be forced to enter into the excessive sexual stimulation.

The decision is judged.

Therefore, this is not limited to the use of juvenile, such as sexual instruments that encourage juveniles to commit obscene acts, which are stipulated in Article 2 (4) 4 (b) (1) of the former Juvenile Protection Act.

arrow