A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

On December 5, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor at Suwon District Court for fraud and the said judgment became final and conclusive on the 13th day of the same month. On September 18, 2014, the Seoul Central District Court sentenced two years of suspension of execution to one year of imprisonment with prison labor at the Seoul Central District Court for fraud, etc. On January 15, 2015, the said judgment became final and conclusive on June 25, 2015, and sentenced two years of suspension of execution to six months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Seoul East East District Court for stolen acquisition. On September 10, 2015, the said judgment became final and conclusive on November 22, 2016, by being sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor and two years of suspension of execution with prison labor at the Seoul Central District Court for fraud, etc. and on July 8, 2017.

Although the judgment was final and conclusive on March 26, 2019 with respect to the case No. 2018 High Court Decision No. 2018 High Court Decision No. 2013, Mar. 26, 2019, the crime of the above judgment was committed after the final and conclusive judgment No. 2013, Dec. 13, 2013. Thus, it does not constitute concurrent crimes under the latter part of Article 3

The term "secondhand loan", which is implemented by the victim B corporation (hereinafter "victim B corporation"), is a loan product that takes place on the condition that the person who intends to obtain a loan under the name of the purchase of used cars, received the relevant vehicle-related documents, etc. and examined them, and thereafter, the person who intends to obtain a loan according to the results of the examination, borrowed an amount equivalent to the purchase amount of used cars and set up a mortgage on the purchased used cars

C is a person who works as a person in charge of loans from the Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Fund in the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., and is engaged in the loan business in the form of "middle loan", and the defendant is a person who is engaged in the business of receiving a certain amount of fees from the F in charge of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. on the condition that the loan is implemented by receiving necessary documents from the person who wants to make

1. The Defendant and G, and H’s co-principal conduct take advantage of the fact that a loan is made prior to the purchase of used cars as above.