The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., a fine of two million won) of the first instance court is too unreasonable;

2. Although the Defendant appears to have led to a confession of the instant crime and there is no particular benefit acquired by the instant crime, the Defendant again led to the proposal that regularly pays money despite having been sentenced to a fine once due to the same criminal act and had the record of being sentenced to a one-time suspension of indictment. The means of access leased by the Defendant was used to commit the instant crime by using computers, etc., causing financial damage to a third party. In full view of all other circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, character, character, environment, criminal records, motive and circumstance of the instant crime, and circumstances after the instant crime, etc., the first instance sentence is not unreasonable, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.