Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the director of the B limited-liability company established for the purpose of manufacturing and selling newspapers, who exercises overall control over the environmental affairs of the above company.

Any person who intends to install emission facilities that emit specific substances harmful to water quality shall obtain permission from the competent authority, and no person shall operate such facilities using emission facilities without obtaining permission.

Nevertheless, from December 27, 2012 to February 12, 2013, the Defendant manufactured a newspaper site at the factory of the above company located in Yong-Namnam Cancer, without obtaining permission for the installation of discharge facilities of copper which is a specific substance harmful to water quality.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement by the prosecution concerning D;

1. Requesting a wastewater discharge facility to take measures for surveying the actual conditions of management of hazardous substances;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to certificates of collection of samples, registers of collection of water, and records of examination of water at places discharging wastewater;

1. Article 75 subparag. 1 and Article 33(1) of the Act on the Conservation of Water Quality and Aquatic Ecosystem (the determination of a fine, and the determination of a fine from February 15, 1996, when the above company operated a control factory with permission for the installation of wastewater discharge facilities from February 15, 1996, it appears that the legal permission of 0.093mg/L is deemed to have been three metersg/L in the investigation of nuclear and waste water and discharged water conducted by the Yeongsan River Environment Office around December 27, 2012. The discovery of the instant case was discovered due to the detection of algras, and the Defendant and the company did not clearly recognize the previous detection of alg/L, taking into account the following factors: (a) the amount of fine has been reduced by taking into account the fact that the Defendant and the company did not clearly recognize the previous detection of algras

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;