1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months;

2. The Defendant’s disclosure of information by means of an information and communications network for three years.

Punishment of the crime

On April 10, 1998, the defendant and the person to whom the attachment order was requested (hereinafter referred to as the "defendant") were sentenced to a two-year sentence of imprisonment for the crime of rape in the Southern Branch of the Seoul District Court, and the above judgment became final and conclusive. On April 16, 2014, the Seoul Central District Court sentenced the two-year sentence of suspension of execution on April 24, 2014 to a two-year sentence of imprisonment for the crime of injury.

Criminal facts

The defendant is a driver who operates Csi.

On July 20, 2014, around 03:37, the Defendant: (a) moved the victim E (n, 27 years of age, 27 years of age) to the front road of Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government; (b) stopped the above taxi at around 03:40 on the same day; (c) obstructed the victim by coercioning the victim by drinking and pottering the victim on his/her own hand; (d) making the victim’s chest her chest her chest her breast with the victim’s chest her chest her chest her chest; and (e) moving the victim into the back seat of the said taxi, leading the victim’s sexual organ to her bridge on the victim’s bridge; and (e) making the victim’s panty her panty.

The Defendant, as described in the above facts of the crime, committed a sexual crime on at least two occasions, and is likely to commit a sexual crime again.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of E prepared by the police;

1. Requests for the preparation of an appraisal report by the National Institute of Scientific Investigation;

1. The point of criminal records indicated in the judgment: Criminal history inquiry report, investigation report (a copy of an inquiry report and a copy of a written opinion), and investigation report prior to the request;

1. The following circumstances, i.e., the defendant was sentenced to juvenile protection in 1986 due to the case where five female students were her natives around 16 years of age, and was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for rape in 1998, and the defendant was convicted of indecent act by force against taxi passengers in 2010, and was not prosecuted due to the victim's cancellation of complaint (a disposition was made without the authority to institute a prosecution).