beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving CK7 cars.
On May 13, 2015, the Defendant driven the above car at a speed of 09:50, the Defendant driven the car at a speed of 70 meters from the parking lot for the king-dong Museum at the time of the race to the long distance from the museum to the long distance from the museum.
At the time, 7-8 persons engaged in driving of a motor vehicle had a duty of care to reduce speed and to prevent accidents by safely driving a motor vehicle in advance by safely driving the motor vehicle at the right and right.
Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and got the victim D (the age of 66) to the right side from the bed left side of the bed side by negligence, which led the defendant to go beyond the ground.
As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim due to the above occupational negligence, such as a fluoral fluoring fluor, which requires approximately 12 weeks of treatment.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a traffic accident report, actual survey report, on-site photograph, medical certificate, and medical statement;
1. In light of the relevant legal provisions on criminal facts, Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents in the Selection of Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act (the occurrence of a penalty penalty, the victim's heavy injury, the confession of the defendant, the purchase of a comprehensive insurance policy, the compensation for the victim seems to have been made. The victim's fault crossing the six-lane without permission was also the cause of the instant accident, and the defendant's negligence is considered to have been relatively minor. The defendant is determined to have been relatively minor in view of the following factors: (a) the defendant's negligence is determined to have been relatively minor, such as: (b) the need for view by the preceding vehicle in the two-lane; and (c) the fact that the victim'