logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.05.01 2018나21851
사해행위취소
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for cases of dismissal or modification as follows. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the

(However, the part for A, which becomes separate and conclusive, is excluded). The third 19 of the judgment of the court of first instance is "the same day" as " March 15, 2016."

Forms 5 through 6 of the fifth decision of the first instance shall be amended as follows:

The court of first instance and the head of Si/Gun/Gu of Incheon, and the head of Si/Gun/Gu of this court as a result of an order to submit tax information on Gap evidence Nos. 7 and Eul evidence Nos. 5 through 7 (including paper numbers), and the court of first instance and the court of first instance to issue an order to submit each information on financial transaction to the court of this court and the court of this case as a whole as a result of the order to submit each information on Eul and N Co., Ltd., Ltd., and the court of first instance and the court of this case to submit all the arguments. In light of the whole purport of the arguments, the contract to establish the mortgage of this case and Eul's active property at the time of the reservation to sell this case are 120,000,000 won in total, and 140,000,000 won in value of O's deposit 20,000 won in total (10,000 won in total x 5,000 won in total).

However, A’s passive property is a secured debt of C, which is a senior mortgagee, 8,574,104 won, 30,000 won, 50,000 won, 50,000 won, 8,280,052 won, 36,000 won, and 50,000 won, 8,280,052 won, and 36,000 won.

arrow