The defendant is not guilty, and the summary of the judgment of innocence is publicly notified.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant operates a D station in Seosan City C.

It is known that anyone should not manufacture or sell pseudo petroleum products.

Nevertheless, on February 21, 2014, the Defendant sold pseudo petroleum products with a volume of approximately KRW 584,500 liter in the market price among them to scke articles where it is difficult to identify the names of 350 liter working at the G site in the G site in Seosan City, even though he knows that such products are mixed with pseudo petroleum products with approximately KRW 5% of 5% of pseudo petroleum products ( approximately 30 liter) by deducting light oil that is not completely removed from the E mobile oil tank tank in which he was parked.

2. The Defendant asserts that the Plaintiff’s wife F caused an accident of mixing the Plaintiff’s wife F by hand, and the Defendant sold the transit oil stored in the vehicle without knowing that the transit oil was mixed. Thus, the Defendant did not constitute a crime.

The facts charged are stated to the effect that the defendant was not aware of mixed oil, and that four samples were collected from the oil station operated by the defendant at the time of the control, and only one sample collected from the above mobile oil station was judged as fake petroleum products, and all quality samples collected from the remaining facilities were judged as fake petroleum products (see Investigation Record No. 7). ③ When the Plaintiff sold one liter at the time of the instant case, the witness F made a statement to the effect that he was unable to know the mixed oil because he also puts them into the tank after being aware of the fact that there remains mixed oil in the tank, and the witness F made a statement to the effect that he was not aware of the mixed oil. ② At the time of the control, four samples were collected from the oil station operated by the defendant, and the remaining samples collected from the above mobile oil station were judged as fake petroleum products (see Investigation Record No. 7 pages). ③ At the time of the instant case, there was a difference between 1,260 won and 1,670 won, and Article 905-50-50-5-5-5-5-5-5-5-30-5-5-5-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3.