Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 100,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a three-dimensional vehicle.

On December 4, 2016, the Defendant changed to the front side of the Dong-dong square, the intersection of the Dong-dong square, and the vehicle that stops in accordance with the vehicle stop signals at the time of Simpo-si on 16:37, 2016.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. An explanatory note;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and subparagraph 3 of Article 156 of the Road Traffic Act, Articles 23 and 22 (2) 1 (Selection of a punishment) of the same Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

1. The Defendant’s defense counsel’s defense counsel on the Defendant’s assertion of defense counsel under Article 186(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act asserts that the illegality of the Defendant’s defense counsel constitutes an act that does not violate social rules and thus, constitutes an act of not impeding the progress of a vehicle that intends to enter a runway in a runway in order not to obstruct the passage of the vehicle that is going to enter the runway on the runway at the time of the instant case.

However, in light of the road situation of the above intersections recognized by the evidence adopted and examined by this court, the defendant observed the stop line of the intersection without going to the future of the vehicle stopped by the defendant.

Even if the vehicle is expected to enter a runway, it seems to have been able to proceed with the vehicle, and even if the defendant complies with the stop line, it was the situation where the progress of the vehicle that the defendant intends to enter the runway was obstructed.

Even if it appears that the driver of a vehicle who intends to enter a runway naturally needs to bear it, and such circumstance alone is that the defendant stops in front of the crosswalk in accordance with the stop signals at the intersection and the vehicle stops in front of the crosswalk (or is added).