logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.11.30 2015고단4261
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Structureed to commit fraud of lending money to workers by leasing money for lease on a deposit basis] The Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport operates a system of lending money for lease on a deposit basis with the National Housing Fund as a source for residential stability of homeless workers at a rate lower than the market interest rate without securing the deposit money for lease on a deposit basis.

The crime of fraud of lending the fund for the fund for the fund for the fund for the fund for the loan of false workers is based on the circumstances such as the loan broker’s total responsibilities, lessor recruitment broker’s employment-related documents, and the loan broker’s loan-related business can easily obtain the loan by undergoing formal examination when submitting only the contract for the fund for the loan of the fund for the lease of the house to the financial institution entrusted with the business of the fund for the loan of the employee. The loan broker’s recruitment broker’s investment in the loan broker’s name under the direction of the loan broker’s total broker’s loan broker’s investment in the loan broker’s name. The loan brok’s investment in the loan broker’s name has made false employment-related documents such as a certificate of employment, payment specifications, income tax withholding certificate, etc. as if the lender actually worked as the employee.

[2015No4261] On September 201, the Defendant, in collusion with patrolmen, E, F, etc. on the early September 201, in order to exercise overall control over the fraud of the loan of this case, F, a false lessee’s recruitment and false lessor’s role, and the Defendant, who took charge of false lessee’s act, borrowed the “housing Lease Fund” and then terminated the said lease contract immediately.

arrow