Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 700,00, and by a fine of KRW 1,200,000.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

[2015 Maz. 544]

1. The Defendants of defamation should also choose “F twice” using a loudspeaker so that the victims E can hear approximately KRW 7,000 of the long-term repair allowances of the above apartment from July 7, 2014 to 18:00 on the same day, even though there was no fact that the victim E embezzled the long-term repair allowances of KRW 7,30 million.

The auditor should vote in 3 and 4 times, and the long-term repair reserve fund of 700 million won has been raised E.

회장 후보 2번은 E이 똘마니다.

E Whether this case is G,

H Doz.,

5 The long-term person who has long-term collection authority has stolen today's length and stolen it first, so it is good to drink a lawsuit, so this is about 5,000 won to gather the whole 5,000 won, 2,80,000 won for long-term repair allowances, 4,50,000 won in advance, and 7,30,000 won in sum 7,000 won in bread.

E Meged to have ever passed on;

Residents shall be crymed with spirit.

The two candidates for the president are the heart of E in the heart of E.

The Chairperson of the Line Chairperson has been involved in the painting work and has tried to drink it.

“The broadcast was broadcast”.

As a result, the Defendants conspired in collusion to damage the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

2. The Defendants who interfere with their business shall be deemed to be invalid by using a loudspeaker to the apartment residents at the same time and at the same place as the preceding paragraph.

It is called the frontline after hearing the non-qualified ones.

The voting is invalid, regardless of whether the members of the election management committee, such as victim I, enter the scene of a representative meeting and audit of the D apartment occupants who are under way on the second floor of the management office of the location, from time to time in the election site of the D apartment occupants, and the voting is made invalid.

“To see,” and to interfere with the smooth progress of the above election.

As a result, the Defendants conspired with and by force interfered with the management of apartment officers such as victim I.