1. The part concerning the plaintiff's conjunctive claim against the defendants is dismissed.

2. The plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a school foundation that establishes and operates the H High School (hereinafter “instant school”); Defendant C is a broadcasting business entity that reports comprehensive news; Defendant D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant D”) is a business entity that engages in domestic and overseas Internet broadcasting, Defendant C’s publication right, and management; and I is a person who was appointed as a teacher of J subject of the instant school on April 22, 2006.

B. On January 10, 2017, the Superintendent of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Office of Education notified the Plaintiff that the instant school will conduct a self-audit for the year 2017 as to the overall operation of the instant school, and accordingly, he/she conducted a comprehensive audit of school foundation B and H high school (hereinafter “instant comprehensive audit”) for the period from July 10, 2017 to July 20, 2017. 2) During the said audit process, I provided the audit team of the Seoul Special Metropolitan Office of Education (hereinafter “Seoul City Office of Education”) with the information of the instant school on July 7, 2017.

On February 21, 2018, the school of this case was selected as a public interest reporter pursuant to Article 10 of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Office of Education Ordinance on the Support and Protection of Public Interest Report. 3) As a result of the comprehensive audit of the school of this case, the school of this case was at issue such as unfair accounting affairs, unfair transactions using family relations, unfair contracts for school construction, and other illegal payment of kindergarten operating expenses, etc., and around September 2017, the school of this case was requested by the Seoul Special Metropolitan City superintendent of education to take disciplinary action against K, which is the principal and the principal of the school of the school of this case, such as disciplinary action against the Plaintiff and the principal of the office of education of Seoul Special Metropolitan City, heavy disciplinary action against K, heavy disciplinary action against the head of the office of administration, and warning to the assistant principal of K, and the cancellation of executive officers of the Plaintiff M and the Plaintiff N, the husband of

C. Each dismissal from position, removal from office, and appeal review of I from the school of this case 1.