logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2019.05.24 2019고합76
강도상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four years.

To the person against whom the attachment order is requested, a location tracking electronic device shall be attached for ten years.

Reasons

Criminal facts

On January 26, 2007, the defendant and the person against whom the attachment order was requested (hereinafter referred to as "defendant") were sentenced to seven years of imprisonment with prison labor for robbery, injury, etc. at the Seoul Western District Court on September 18, 2013, and the execution of the sentence was completed. On September 26, 2017, the Daegu District Court rendered a sentence of eight months of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny and the execution of the sentence was completed by the North Korean Family Court on April 1, 2018.

【Criminal Facts】

On February 20, 2019: (a) around 06:18, the Defendant: (b) forced the victim’s resistance by taking the victim’s scam 18K 18 KK 1,60,000 won at the victim’s wearing 1,60,000 won at the victim’s seat; (c) deducted the victim’s 2,00,000,000 won in total, including the sum of KRW 1,60,000,00,000 in cash 40,000 in the victim’s seat; and (d) took the victim’s scam 1,60,000,00 won in total; and (e) took the victim’s scam 14-day care.

Accordingly, the defendant took the property of the victim and inflicted an injury on the victim.

[The facts constituting the crime of robbery] As seen earlier, the Defendant was sentenced to seven years of imprisonment for robbery on January 26, 2007, and the Defendant again completed the execution of the said sentence on September 18, 2013 and again committed robbery within ten years after the completion of the said sentence, and the person who was sentenced to imprisonment for robbery due to robbery constitutes a crime of robbery again; the former robbery and the Act on the Acceptance of Crimes are the same; the strength of robbery and the injury by robbery are more than twice, and there is a history of punishment several times due to robbery, etc., the Defendant is likely to recommit robbery.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A report on evaluation of criminal injury caused by drilling;

1. Each investigation report is called up to 112 reports and the details of confirmation of the victim;

arrow