Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

On June 21, 2015, around 20:20 on June 21, 2015, the Defendant committed an indecent act against the victim D (V, 32 years old) who was located in the said PC holder among the PC holders located in CPC toilets located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government building 105.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to police statements made to victims;

1. Article 298 of the Criminal Act and Article 298 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Where a conviction of a defendant against a sex crime subject to registration becomes final and conclusive on the judgment that constitutes a sex crime subject to registration under Article 16(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed to Order, the defendant is a person subject to registration of personal information under Article 42(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, and is obligated to

In light of the Defendant’s age, occupation, risk of repeating a crime, type, motive, process, seriousness of the crime in this case, disclosure order or notification order, the degree of disadvantage and anticipated side effects to be affected by the Defendant’s entrance, the preventive effect of sexual crimes subject to registration which may be achieved therefrom, the effect of the protection of the victim, the favorable circumstances as seen earlier, etc., the Defendant is not ordered to disclose or notify personal information pursuant to Articles 47(1) and 49(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, the proviso to Article 49(1) and the proviso to Article 50(1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse, and thus, the Defendant is not ordered to issue an disclosure order or notification order to the Defendant.