The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal does not include the statement as to the facts charged, and the court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles.

2. There are statements from victims D, E, and F as evidence corresponding to the facts charged in the instant case.

The victim at the investigative agency and the court of the court of the court below "the defendant is the defendant's implied insurance premium in the presence of the E, F and taxi officers in the front of the Csi office in September 2014."

Does they were hospitalized;

Doing in a false manner;

A statement was made to the effect that the G representative son said that he was guilty, and that he was drinking.”

Witness

E and F also stated in the investigative agency and the court of the court below as above.

As such, not only the victim but also the witness E/F consistently with the investigative agency and the court to the same effect as the facts charged;

The statement has been made, and the victim, witness E and F have made a false statement even when the victim, witness E and F are punished for perjury.

In light of the fact that the statement between the victim and the witness is not visible, the credibility of both the statement is recognized (the evidence submitted by the defendant alone is insufficient to reverse it). Therefore, since the defendant can sufficiently recognize the fact that the defendant defames the victim by openly pointing out false facts as stated in the facts constituting the crime in the judgment below, the above argument by the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.