The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (two months of imprisonment for each of the crimes of No. 1 and No. 2) declared by the court below is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant recognized the error of the crime of this case and is in depth against it.

On June 2010, the damaged vehicle caused by the larceny was restored to the victim, and the victim K did not want the punishment of the defendant.

From 16 years of age to 16 years of age, there is a situation that the defendant lives in a poor family environment, such as living together with his/her parents.

However, on April 13, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. by the Daejeon District Court on September 3, 2011, and again committed the larceny crime against the victim K during the period of repeated crime after the execution of the sentence was completed.

around June 2010, the crime was committed by the defendant, who was driving the victim D's cattle at the time of the Gu and in Daegu, and the nature of the crime is heavy.

The lower court determined punishment in consideration of equity with the case where each of the instant crimes was committed on January 2, 2011 and 2014, on the grounds that the crime for which judgment became final and conclusive and the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act are concurrent crimes.

In addition, comprehensively considering the age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, etc. of the defendant and all the sentencing conditions shown in the arguments, each sentence sentenced by the court below is appropriate and too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.