logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2018.10.25 2017고단2363
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2017 Highest 2363] The Defendant was a person who was in a relationship with the mother of the injured party C (18 years old) from January 2017 to September 11, 2017, and the injured party C is a student who resides in the F high school dormitory in 1,00 city E, and the injured party G (54 years old) is a person who is in charge of the duties, such as maintaining order in the workplace, as the head of the above dormitory.

1. The Defendant, who interfered with the work, did not communicate with D, did not look at C, and found C at the above dormitory around September 12, 2017.

The defendant set up his entrance door, set up the door by hand, and set up the door, and the victim G opened the entrance, and entered the entrance in the main dormitory.

The Defendant, who was glicked to C, was not connected with C, was able to enter the scam room, without the consent of the said victim, and turn on the broadcast system in the scam room and run on the scambling room, and “hump and dump, at the time of the scam and the scambal with other males who were sexually related, rather than the scam.

“ ......................”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the business of maintaining order in the dormitory of the victim by force.

2. The Defendant, in refusal of the withdrawal, did not refuse the request from the victim G to leave the dormitory at the time of the day specified in paragraph 1, and did not leave the dormitory without any justifiable reason.

Accordingly, the defendant did not comply with the demand of the victim to leave.

3. Intimidation Defendant, within the time limit set out in paragraph 1, will bring the victim C with a sex-related video with another male who is not a scarcity, at the time of the arrival of the above dormitory for the said reasons through a broadcasting system in the dormitory for the said reasons.

‘A broadcast’ showed the attitude of seeing that it would inflict harm on the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant threatened the victim.

[2017 Highest 2771]

arrow