logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2016.07.21 2016고합83
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(13세미만미성년자유사성행위)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four years.

The defendant shall be ordered to complete a sexual assault treatment program for 120 hours.

(e).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The criminal facts were partly revised according to the facts acknowledged within the extent that it does not actually disadvantage the defendant's right of defense.

The defendant is the father and father of the victim C (V, 6 years of age).

The Defendant, around 08:10 on April 10, 2016, at the small location of his residence located in Da, Kim Young-si, Kim Young-si, the Defendant: (a) stated that the Defendant, who was the victim, was “explosible”; (b) was placed on one’s side; (c) was placed on the part of the Defendant, on the part of the Defendant, who was suffering from the victim; (d) was also suffering

After having panty bucks up to bucks, the victim's negative records were met by hand.

피고인은 피해 자가 아파하며 피고인의 손을 잡아 뺐음에도 불구하고 계속하여 피해자의 음부를 만지고 피해자의 엉덩이 사이에 피고인의 성기를 밀착시켜 3~4 회에 걸쳐 비볐다.

Accordingly, the defendant committed an indecent act against the victim under 13 years of age.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C’s statement recorded in the victim’s statement video CD [the victim’s statement is consistent, concrete and consistent as a whole, the victim’s attitude to memory his experienced, as well as the fact that the victim’s statement was false or exaggerated, or there is no circumstance that the victim’s statement should be made by making a false statement, and the victim’s statement analysis experts E may be able to make the victim’s statement in light of the above circumstances.

In light of the analysis, the victim's statement is reliable.

1. The first and second suspect interrogation records against the defendant (the defendant and the defense counsel asserted that the defendant and the defense counsel stated the interrogation records of the suspect interrogation records of the prosecutor's office 1 and the second and second prosecutor's office 1 and the prosecutor's office 2 as they are under pressure due to the lack of sufficient health to the extent that they were used at the time, and thus, such statements are not voluntary. However, the defendant, which are acknowledged by the

arrow