beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff’s appeal against the Defendants and the incidental appeal against Defendant D and F are all dismissed.
2. Costs due to an appeal.
Reasons
1. In the first instance trial, the Plaintiff filed a claim for damages due to each of the unlawful loans listed in the table of [Attachment 1] 1 to 12 against Defendant B, C, D, and E, and the claim for damages due to the excess of the credit limit for the same person as indicated in the table of [Attachment 6, 7, 9, 11, and 12], as to Defendant B, C, D, and E, and the claim for damages due to the excess of the credit limit for the same person as indicated in the table of [Attachment 4] 6, 7, 9, 11, and 12, as to Defendant F, and for Defendant B, E, as each of the credit guarantee agencies for Defendant D, E, and E, and the first instance court dismissed the claim against Defendant B, C, D, and F, and the remainder of the claim against Defendant B, C, D, D, and F, respectively.
As to this, the Plaintiff filed an appeal against the Defendants only for the claim for damages arising from each unfair security loan listed in the separate sheet Nos. 3, 6 through 9, 11, and 12, and Defendant D and F filed an appeal against the aforementioned part against the Defendants.
Therefore, the subject of this Court's adjudication is limited to the claim for damages arising from each unfair security loan listed in the table Nos. 1, 3, 6 through 9, 11, and 12.
2. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is as follows, and such reasoning is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the
3. The executive officers and employees of the financial institution under the relevant legal principles are obliged to exercise the duty of due care to the financial institution to which they belong, as they are the executives and employees of the financial institution under the relevant legal principles of the first instance court’s 7, 11, 7, 12, and 12 of the first instance court’s 6th court’s 7, 7, 12, and 12 of the 6th court’s 7th court’s 7th judgment of the first instance court.