logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.12.15 2015고단1236
사기
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

Summary of Facts charged

1. The Defendant was aware that the victim D supplied steel bars to the construction site of the Gyeonggi-gun E apartment, and that the owner of the construction business company would be transferred the above E apartment 1 bonds under the pretext of payment in kind for the price of supplied goods from the owner of the construction business company.

On February 2, 2006, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that, “A bond business operator cannot receive E apartment as a substitute for the victim’s principal office in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office” to the effect that “A bond business operator would not receive a substitute for E apartment if he/she gets involved in violence. As such, as if he/she transferred B to B, he/she would transfer B a loan certificate in the name of the principal, wife H, and later transfer ownership.”

However, even if the defendant transferred the ownership of the above E Apartment 1 in the above H name, he did not have the intention or ability to transfer it to the victim.

Around December 3, 2008, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received a loan certificate from the victim as if he had been transferred the right to the above E apartment 1 bonds, and used it to acquire the property equivalent to the above E apartment 102 Dong 902, which is equivalent to 111,30,000 won from the Gai District Court's Gai registry office, and completed the registration of ownership transfer in the above H's name.

2. Around January 20, 2009, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “Around January 20, 2009, the Defendant would have to pay 5 million won to the victim D, while lending 5 million won to the victim D.”

However, there was no intention or ability to repay the borrowed money due to the fact that the defendant was in a bad credit position and was unable to receive the borrowed money from another person while lending money from another person.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 5,00,000 from the victim to the account in the name of his wife H on the same day.

The defendant, in addition to this, is a list of crimes.

arrow