All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The sentence (10 months of imprisonment with prison labor, and 8 months of imprisonment with prison labor) declared by the court below in summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that all the defendants recognized the crime of this case and reflected in the crime of this case, the defendants did not have the same criminal record, there were family members to support each of the defendants, and the defendants' will want to take the measures.

However, it is also recognized that the crime of selling and distributing the relics of this case is the act of impairing the distribution order of telecommunications services or mobile communications terminal devices, and facilitating the crime committed in voice, such as illegal sports discussions, and that there is a great need for social harm and punishment. The Supreme Court held that the Defendants sold from August 2016 to March 2017 are 1,074 in a total of 1,074, the Supreme Court held that most of the above large-scale distribution were used for other crimes, and that the Defendants could not have made a large amount of profits from the above sales.

In addition, in full view of the various circumstances that are conditions for sentencing, such as the Defendants’ age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, motive and background of the offense, means and consequence, and there are no special circumstances or changes in circumstances that may change the sentencing after the judgment of the court below, it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the Defendants’ appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition.