beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Around January 17, 2008, the Defendant received KRW 40 million from C to receive KRW 40 million from D, and received the above KRW 40 million from D (if the Defendant was to receive the above money from D, the Defendant has part of the Defendant, and the remainder is returned to C). A copy of a promissory note 2 million from D was paid KRW 3 million from D as evidence of the claim between February 17, 2008 and March 208, and only acquired KRW 20 million from D from February 2008, and also acquired the above claim from D against a third party. Based on the above claim acquired from D, the Defendant was additionally paid KRW 5 million from the third party.
However, the Defendant received only a partial payment from D as above, and tried to file a civil suit against D due to the shortage of living expenses, etc. while receiving the payment, but as above, C tried to prepare at will the remainder of KRW 38 million loan certificates other than one of the promissory notes with respect to which evidence was not separately produced and submit them as evidence for the civil suit against D.
1. On February 5, 2013, at a place where it is impossible to identify the place where a police officer was located at the early February 2013, the Defendant: (a) borrowed the amount of money from the creditor on March 5, 1998, using a computer and an authorized-type pen in blank (38,00,000 MF); (b) the obligor borrowed the money from the creditor on March 5, 1998. The interest shall be repaid at 45%; (c) the principal shall be repaid to the creditor by March 5, 198; (d) the debtor column stating “D, Gangdong-gu, Seoul; F” in the debtor column; and (d) the creditor column stating “C” and then serving a private person adjacent to D name.
Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a letter of loan in the name of D or C, a private document related to rights and obligations.
2. On April 15, 2013, the Defendant filed a lawsuit against the said D’s claim for prohibition of transfer at the Dong District Court’s civil petition office around Seoul East District Court, and forged.