A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Of the costs of the lawsuit, the costs of the lawsuit are after the second trial date and the national defense counsel.

Punishment of the crime

On June 10, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (Habitual Assault), etc. at the Ulsan District Court on November 30, 2012, and was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of injury at the Ulsan District Court on August 22, 2013, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Southern District Court on June 25, 2014.

1. The Defendant, who attempted to attack and attack, committed an act as the chairman of the guidance committee for the crackdown on illegal conduct of interest by an attorney-at-law at his own name, and found a proprietor of a shop in Ulsan-gu C, Ulsan-gu, where he well knows the Defendant’s violent criminal records and scarcity characteristics, etc., with the intent to interfere with money and valuables in the name of support payments.

A. On December 12, 2014, the Defendant demanded the victim to “Fuding room” in the “Fuding room” operated by the U.S. D Victim E (51) in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, U.S. (51) as business expenses, and if the victim refuses it, reported the victim’s business to the control agency that the victim’s business is engaged in illegal business, or continued to find the business place and put the scambling.

As such, the Defendant got 20,000 won from the victim, who frightened the victim, and received frighten from the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant received property by threatening the victim.

B. On February 1, 2015, the Defendant, at around 18:00, displayed the name of the victim’s “Ising room” in the “Ising room” operated by Ulsan-gu G Victim H (58) in Ulsan-gu G, Ulsan-gu, where it is necessary to carry out operating expenses, and the Defendant refused to request KRW 300,000,000, reported to the control agency that the victim’s business place engages in illegal business, or continued to find the business place and put the scambling.

The Defendant, as such, rejected the victim’s attack, but if the Defendant’s demand is complied with, the victim had concerns over more serious level of the demand.

In this respect.