Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal records] The Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment with labor by obstructing business operations at the Gangnam District Court's Gangnam Branch on January 10, 2017, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Sungsung Vocational Training Institution on September 8, 2017.
[Criminal facts]
1. On October 11, 2017, the Defendant: (a) while drunk around 18:35 on October 18, 2017, the Defendant: (b) obstructed the Defendant’s operation of the restaurant by the victim of the victim’s cafeteria C (the 70-year-old 70-year-old cafeteria; (c) provided approximately 30 minutes to the victim who was preparing for the meals of other customers; and (d) provided approximately 30 minutes to the victim who was aware of why he did not know why he did not drink; and (d) provided alcohol to the victim, by force, they interfere with the victim’s operation of the restaurant.
2. The Defendant was under the influence of alcohol at or near a place specified in paragraph (1) and investigated the migratory population for the revitalization of the market at or near that place without any justifiable reason.
F 대학교 학생인 피해자 G( 여, 19세 )에게 “ 이 썅년아, 씹할 년 아 ”라고 큰소리로 욕을 하면서 발을 들어올려 피해자를 걷어찰 듯이 휘두르고, 재차 피해자의 얼굴을 향해 때릴 듯이 주먹을 1회 휘둘러 피해자를 폭행하였다.
3. The Defendant was at around 18:50 on October 11, 2017, at the place indicated in the foregoing paragraph 1, and at around 112 on October 11, 2017, the Defendant was subject to verification of the Defendant’s personal information from the police officers I ( South, 30 years old) belonging to the Gangnam Police Station H District, dispatched after receiving a 112 report.
Accordingly, the Defendant asked his personal information to the police officer who intends to give out tobacco, refers to the Defendant’s “masting smoking in a public place”, and restrains the Defendant from smoking at a public place, and whether the Defendant “finite finites grow anywhere;
This whin theory was made on a large scale of 'this whin?', and the left-hand side of police officer I was made at one time due to the drinking of the walk.
Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reports.
(i) the evidence;