logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2020.06.11 2020고정67
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a B car.

On October 29, 2019, the defendant, around 12:33 on October 29, 2019, moved the front house C in Ansan-si, Seosan-si into the shore from the surface of a water industry road to the surface of the coast.

Vehicles coming from the front side have been temporarily stopped.

A person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely operate the steering gear by accurately operating the steering gear and steering gear in the future before moving back.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and caused the damage to the victim D (31 years of age, son) who temporarily stopped onto the aftermath of the mast vehicle due to negligence, and the front wheels part of the math of the mast vehicle was shocked with the rear part of the math vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim due to the above occupational negligence, such as “knee knee knee knee and tension,” and at the same time damaged the damaged gate to the extent of KRW 625,000 per repair cost.

2. The instant case is an offense falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases Concern

After the prosecution of this case, the victim expressed his wish not to punish the defendant.

(2) The prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow