Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who produces and sells sons in Jeonju-gun C and D.

No person shall place an organic label or any similar label (including any label that is likely to mislead people to believe that such label is a human evidence and any other mark in a foreign language or foreign language related thereto) on any non-certified product.

Nevertheless, from February 7, 2017 to May 6, 2017, the Defendant supplied F Consumers’ Living Cooperatives in Yeongsan-gu, Jeonju-si with a total of KRW 12,727,500,00, to the F Consumers’ Cooperatives in Jeonsan-gu, Jeonju-si, with a tag indicating the certification mark, certification number (G), and producer (A).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A statement of the detection;

1. [Public questions] Requests for the treatment of the detection of residues of environment-friendly agricultural chemicals;

1. To make an investigation report (to secure details of supply of ancillarys);

1. Investigation reports (Securing details of environment-friendly certified administrative dispositions);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reports (specific details of violations);

1. Article 60 (1) 5 and Article 30 (1) 2 of the Act on the Fostering of Environment-Friendly Agriculture and Fishing Businesses and the Management of and Support for Organic Food, Etc. (Amended by Act No. 14305, Dec. 2, 2016); Selection of fines for criminal facts;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. 가납명령 형사 소송법 제 334조 제 1 항 양형의 이유 이 사건 범행은 정직하게 농산물을 유통ㆍ판매하는 생산자 및 유통업자들에게 큰 피해를 주며, 친환경 농산물 인증 제도에 대한 소비자의 신뢰를 무너뜨린 것으로 죄질이 좋지 않다 할 것이나, 피고인이 약 2004년 경부터 무농약 재배 인증을 받아 왔는데, 2017. 1. 경 소독제품을 친 환경 판매업체가 권유한 제품으로 바꿨다가 허용기준을 초과하게 되어 인증이 취소된 점, 피고인이 납품한 제품들에 대해 잔류농약분석을 한 결과 그 검출 치가 허용기준 미만으로 나온 점, 이 사건...