The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The facts charged: (a) from around 02:00 on February 22, 2012 to around 04:30, C performed the overall management so that gambling can be achieved by gathering gambling people from “E located in D”, and (b) according to the direction of C, F and G served as a c’s c’s c’s c’s c’s c’s c’s c’s c’s c’s c’s c’s c’s c’s c’s c’s c’s c’s c’s c’s c’s c’s c’s f’s c’s c’s c’s c’s c’s f’s c’s c’s c’s f’s c’s c’,

피고인은 J, K, L, M, N, O, P, Q, R, S 등과 함께 위 일시, 장소에서 화투 20장을 이용하여 바닥 3곳에 1장씩 분배한 후 1곳에 C가, 나머지 2곳에 찍새들이 1판당 5만원의 판돈을 걸고, 3곳에 4장씩 더 분배하여 총 5장을 1패로 분배한 후 1패의 화투 3장으로 10이나 20을 만들고 나머지 2장의 끝수를 비교하여 그 숫자가 높은 사람이 승리하는 방식의 ‘도리짓고땡’이라는 도박을 하였다.

2. As to the determination, the Defendant asserted to the effect that he did not participate in gambling even though he had been in the above E at the time.

The charges should be proved by the prosecutor, and the burden of proof should be based on the strict evidence with probative value, which leads to a judge’s conviction to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt, and if there is no such evidence, the suspicion of guilt is against the defendant.

Even if there is no choice but to judge the interests of the defendant.

Comprehensively taking account of the evidence presented by the prosecutor, the defendant was at a temporary gambling site during the late night, and the defendant asked for the above location because he would receive money from his children at the time, but the defendant did not properly specify the debtor's personal information, regardless of the amount of monetary claims claimed by the defendant.