1. As to each real estate listed in the separate sheet between Defendant B and J on July 15, 2009, approximately 2,622,602.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The J purchased the instant real estate from a new environment development corporation on November 7, 2001, and completed the registration of ownership transfer under its own name on March 17, 2005. At the same time, a PP mutual savings bank, a PP mutual savings bank, or a PP mutual savings bank (hereinafter “PP mutual savings bank, etc.”) in order to pay sales balance.

(3) On March 16, 2005, the Plaintiff acquired a loan from the instant real estate as collateral and completed the registration of creation of a collateral on the same day, such as the contract to establish a contract, the maximum debt amount of 14 billion won, the debtor J, the mortgagee J, and the Daol Real Estate Trust Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Daol Real Estate Trust”).

(2) In the name of the management trust agreement (hereinafter “instant trust agreement”)

(2) On August 24, 2006, Defendant D received a provisional disposition prohibiting disposal of the instant real estate and completed the entry registration on August 28, 2006 in order to preserve the right to claim the cancellation of the ownership transfer registration due to the revocation of fraudulent act.

(hereinafter “Defendant D’s provisional disposition”). B.

1) The revocation of the instant trust agreement on the ground of a fraudulent act is the first instance company, the creditor of J (hereinafter referred to as “first instance company”).

On July 2007, the judgment was rendered to revoke the instant trust agreement corresponding to the fraudulent act on March 25, 2009 and to revoke the registration of transfer of ownership under the name of Daol Real Estate Trust (Seoul Central District Court Decision 2007Gahap57171, the above judgment was finalized on May 15, 2009.

On May 22, 2009, when a contract for the sale of the instant real estate was concluded by the J on May 22, 2009, the first vessel company and the J paid KRW 1.43 billion to the first vessel company, and at the same time, the first vessel company and the J needed to enforce the said judgment.