1. The plaintiffs' primary claims are dismissed.

2. Of H 8414 square meters of H forest land in e.g., indication 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff A is the deceased I's wife, the rest of the plaintiffs are the children of the deceased I, and the defendant is the children of the deceased J.

On the other hand, the back of the network K and the network L is the network J and the south is the network I, and the family relationship between the plaintiffs and the defendant is as follows.

MNK L YO YO P QR T UVJ AC AC AE AE AE AGH W AB AB MD CDD

B. The land before the instant subdivision was owned by M. The land of AI 917 square meters (hereinafter “the land before the instant subdivision”). On April 1, 1967, the land was restored under the name of the network I on the old forest register, and on August 11, 1971, the registration of ownership preservation was completed under the former Act on Special Measures for the Registration, etc. of Forest Land Ownership (Act No. 2111, May 21, 1969; hereinafter “Forest Measures Act”).

Before the instant partition, the land was divided into 1503 square meters of AI forest land (hereinafter “AI land”) and the land of this case (hereinafter “instant land division”) on May 17, 1979, and on June 20, 1981, the ownership transfer registration under the name of the defendant (hereinafter “the instant registration”) was completed on October 31, 197, based on subdivision registration and the former Act on Special Measures for the Transfer of Ownership of Real Estate (Act No. 3094, Dec. 31, 197; hereinafter “Special Measures Act”) on the land of this case on October 5, 1972.

C. The status of transfer of ownership of the pertinent property between the plaintiffs and M's descendants, including the defendant, is as shown in the attached Table 2.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 8, 14, 25, Eul evidence 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. As to the primary claim of the plaintiffs, the grounds for registration of this case was trading on October 25, 1973, but the deceased as the immediately preceding registration titleholder had already concluded the above sales contract by the deceased before the date of the above sale.