logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.09.20 2016가단232558
공사대금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 40,000,000 as well as the annual rate of KRW 6% from May 1, 2013 to June 20, 2017 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

In full view of the respective entries and arguments set forth in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5, around the end of 2011, the defendant prepared a joint agreement with Eul, the owner of the land in Gyeyang-gun, Gyeonggi-do, to promote the project to create F in one of the above land, and according to G's testimony made by the defendant in the claim for return of agreed money, etc. (which is currently in progress) brought against Eul (which is the main district court branch court 2016No5766, which is now in progress), the defendant proposed that he would sell the above land to G, which he had known through H's introduction, around August 201, 201, and that he would sell the above land to G, which he would have been responsible for the above construction work to the plaintiff as the construction business operator, and that he would have been given the above land construction permit to the plaintiff as the above 20-year office. The defendant introduced the above building construction permit to the plaintiff as the construction business operator, which is the above 20-year office.

Therefore, it is reasonable to view that the Defendant, as a joint business owner of the above land development project, ordered the Plaintiff through G to construct the above wooden house.

Therefore, the Defendant’s construction cost of KRW 40,000,000 for the above wooden housing units and its completion date is clear to the Plaintiff from May 1, 2013.

arrow