The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On October 28, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 08:00 on October 28, 2018, at the office of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu; (b) while talking about the victim D (the age of 62) and employment insurance, and the victim’s humf was “Isp” to the victim who had a humf, who had a humf, caused the victim’s humf, and humfed the victim’s humf, and caused the victim’s injury to the humf, which requires approximately three weeks of treatment.

2. The non-guilty part

A. The burden of proving the facts charged in a criminal trial is to be borne by the public prosecutor, and the conviction is to be based on the evidence of probative value that makes the judge feel true beyond a reasonable doubt. Therefore, if there is no such evidence, the defendant is suspected of guilty, even if there is no such evidence.

Even if there is no choice but to judge the interests of the defendant.

(See Supreme Court Decisions 2002Do5662 Decided December 24, 2002; 2006Do1713 Decided May 26, 2006; 2009Do1151 Decided July 22, 2010, etc.). B.

According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the defendant committed an assault, such as taking the victim's neck and taking a drinking face as stated in the facts charged, and the victim visited the hospital following the date of the occurrence of the case and received the injury diagnosis on November 19, 2018.

C. However, in light of the following circumstances revealed by the record, it is insufficient to readily conclude that the victim, witness E, and F’s statement and injury diagnosis report in the investigative agency and court alone constituted an injury identical to the Defendant’s act of assaulting the victim as stated in the facts charged of this case. There is no evidence to acknowledge otherwise.

(1) A defendant is a victim from an investigative agency to this court.