logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.06.21 2018고단351
사기
Text

The imprisonment with prison labor for the accused shall be determined by one year and two months.

An application for compensation by an applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On October 27, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Northern District Court, and on March 14, 2017, the Seoul Southern Prison completed the execution of the sentence.

[1] The Defendant did not possess gift certificates, etc. that can be sold, but written as if he sold goods on the Internet car page, and received money from the victims who reported and contacted the money by receiving transfer of money from the victims, and used money as Internet gambling funds, living expenses, etc.

Accordingly, on October 24, 2017, at a place where the address is unknown, the Defendant: (a) 2 head of merchandise coupon 2 was placed in the original 200,000 won; (b) as if he sold KRW 190,000 on the Internet as if he/she had been sold on the Internet; and (c) received KRW 190,000 from the victim D who reported and contacted this on the same day from the victim D who received KRW 190,00 from the victim D to the Defendant’s name bank account on the same day; and (d) received a total of KRW 2,295,000 from around that time to December 10, 2017 from that time, and acquired the money from the total of nine victims as indicated in the

2. On January 26, 2018, the Defendant, “2018 Highest 1350,” connects the Internet NAV “E” page to a public notice telecom where the trade name near the king Station located in Seongdong-gu Seoul around January 26, 2018 is unknown and sells a new global mobile merchandise coupon.

The term "I am this writing," and the victim F, who reported it, made a false statement to the victim F, who sold 300,000 won mobile merchandise to 275,000 won.

However, since the defendant did not own a new global mobile merchandise coupon, even if he received money from the damaged person as the price for merchandise coupons, he did not have an intention or ability to send merchandise coupons to the victim.

As such, the defendant deceivings the victim to do so and vice versa in the name of the defendant in the same name as the price for merchandise coupons on the same day.

arrow